Euro British Coalition 

britishcanada.org -eurohumanist.org
Ideas on Policing (Click here for main page)

Our views on prostitution legality I have long argued that prostitution be none of the business of the state and that fair rules apply to protect both men and women from unfair or predatory practices - especially protecting women from violence or coercive demands which are clearly criminally minded - as there is to be zero tolerance in having such a situation persist in our midst upon determination of the facts in this respect by fair minded investigators. The question is this: is a man a criminal (as described to be the law in Sweden and Canada too etc) just because he explicitly sees a need to bargain for sex - even if he has merited arguments as to his decency and overall fitness to be a partner in the situation - and is wishing to pay voluntarily in what would be a mutually agreed upon bargain then? Many happen to think in old fashioned terms in wanting as men, to be providers to women and of course as is equally natural, men and women in relationships tend to want to explore sex as something to give them intimacy and mutual joy of human sharing of themselves if possibly not something that would then be argued to be "prostitution" as the man may in fact be paying the bills as has been traditionally our practice as human beings in western societies especially - whether the relationship lasts an hour, a weekend, or a lifetime! Who's is to say that is wrong and "inherently abusive to women" in "denying them equality"? The world seems to have gone insane in using "feigns" as legitimate arguments and many on this video have nothing but defects in logic and value assumptions in what it is they wish to inflict upon others of their own seeming witch-like oriented mindsets which may be suspect of misogyny or misanthropy too in some cases - Men who pay for sex in what sounds like situations that would likely be unpleasant for women who are subjected to this sort of abuse are also interviewed or spoken to on the phone. Hell... many have argued that "marriage is legalized prostitution"  If the man gives no care to the woman - then who can blame them for saying so if she's forced to meet his needs anyway? However if there's mutual merit involved - call it what you will its what is natural enough for many to still want for themselves and their partners in loving spirit I submit! No one has the right to tell me not to pay a woman I fancy and would like to take care of for an evening in whatever way pleases her and me as mutually caring human beings potentially. In such overall  respects I say the state must "butt out" as too many are in power positions who are offended by normal goings on in what has been human affairs in "fair enough" fashion I submit - in any event that's the situations in which I say the state is acting "ultra vires" (legal Latin phrase meaning "beyond its powers") by choosing to interfere in what would then be clear incompetent manner. Michael Rizzo Chessman Human Rights crusader info@ideasforpolicing.com   (Tel) 416-900-5754 (Leave message) Teach the kids in a Christianly way!